• Yongping Feng Wuhan University
  • Chanattaporn Netkhunakorn Wuhan University, Wuhan Hubei
Keywords: The United States and China, Thailand Military, Thailand Diplomacy, Hedging Strategy


Thailand's foreign policy stance has shifted dramatically since the Prayuth regime staged a coup in 2014. The purpose of this study: 1) Complement and expand on the theoretical meaning of hedging strategy. 2) It can theoretically support Thailand in the face of strategic conflict between China and the United States. 3) Be aware of why Thailand implements a hedging strategy and know the specific performance of Thailand’s hedging strategy. 4) It will aid in the growth of Thailand's connections with the two big countries. 5) This article can provide certain reference for research related to Thailand’s diplomatic strategy. The method of this study adopts content documentary analysis, case analysis method, literature research and historical method.

According to the findings of this study, Thailand has begun to tilt more toward requesting assistance from China in Prayuth goverment. Many researchers are concerned about Thailand's neutrality. However, Thailand has not yet vanished from the United States. Just a few steps removed from the Obama and Trump administrations. Thailand has begun to rebuild its old friendship with America as the Joe Biden era looms. But anyway Thailand cannot choose a side. Because Thailand is a reliable ally on both sides. This has caused the Prayut government to seek cooperation from other organizations and countries, including Japan, India, and ASEAN. Thailand has accelerated the development of economic links with Japan. Accelerate the political development of relations with India. and establishing ties with ASEAN and Southeastern countries in order to find a way for small countries to maintain their own interests as much as possible in the fight between the two superpowers. Although hedging techniques are currently the preferred option for smaller countries, the variables driving this strategy differ. In Thailand, the majority of the factors that influence hedging tactics originate within the country. But all bordering countries are influenced by foreign causes. As a result, Thailand has become another special case of hedging among ASEAN countries.


Download data is not yet available.


Alfred Gerstl. (2022). Hedging Strategies in Southeast Asia: ASEAN, Malaysia, the Philippines and Vietnam and their relations with China,New York: Routledge.

Arne Kislenko (2002). Bending the wind: The Continuity and Flexibility of Thai Foreign Policy.International Journal,57(4),537-561.

Arm Tang Nirundorn. (2019).How does ASEAN act under the China-US wars.The101

world.Retrieved September 16, 2023.from:


Arunwatri,R. (2023).How about Thailand?! When China is about to become the big brother of the world's kitchen.The101world.Retrieved October 3, 2023.from:

Busbarat,P. (2014).Thailand’s Foreign Policy:The Struggle for Regiona Leadership in Southeast Asia(pp.133-153).In book: Foreign Policy and Security in an Asian Century: Threats, Strategies and Policy Choices.

Busbarat,P. (2016).“Bamboo Swirling in the wind”: Thailand's Foreign Policy Imbalance between China and the United States.Contemporary Southeast Asia,38(2),233-257.

Cao,W. (2021).Taking Sides or Hedging: Asia-Pacific Countries' Choices in the

Background of China-U.S. Strategic Competition.World Economics and Politics,(2),47-77.

Chachavalpongpun,P.(2011).Competing Diplomacies:Thailand amidst Sino-

American Rivalry.Southeast Asian Affairs,306-319.

Chaiyalangka,B.(2016).The Balance of Power between the Great Powers:Neo-

Realism Theory Analysis.National Defence Studies Institute Journal,7(3),24-33.

Chaleecha,R.(2022).(Thailand's role in wartime: Perspectives from foreign policy).

Pridi Banomyong Institute.Retrieved October 19, 2023.from:


Chen,J.Q.(2019).Balanced diplomacy in the crack--Taking Thailand's foreign policy toward the United States and China as an example after the Cold War (1990-2019).China:Wuhan University.

Chen,Y.(2021).The India-Pacific Geopolitical Tension and the Limits of Southeast Asian Countries'Hedging Strategy.International Relations Studies,(4),108-128.

Cheng‑Chwee Kuik.(2021).Getting hedging right: a small‑state perspective.China International Strategy Review,(3),300-315.

Chongkittavorn,K.(2019). The Thailand-U.S. Defense Alliance in U.S.-Indo-Pacific Strategy.East West Center,137,1-12.

Cui,T.(2018).A Study on Thailand’s “Balance Diplomacy” to China and the US (1991-2017).China:xiangtan University.

Cui,Y.H.(2018).South Korea’s Balancing Diplmacy Between China and The United States.China:Yanbian University.

Denny Roy.(2005).“Southeast Asia and China: Balancing or Bandwagoing?”.

Contemporary Southeast Asia,(27),312-313.

Ding,H.,Tang,Zh.Y.(2018).Indonesia’s response to the Indo-Pacific strategy—an analysis of Indonesia’s“Indo-Pacific policy”.Crossroads:Southeast Asian


Du,Y.(2022).An analysis of the reputational logic of the “hedging” behavior of U.S. Asia-Pacific allies.China:Foreign Affairs College.

Evan S. Medeiros.(2005).Strategic Hedging and the Future of Asia-Pacific Stability.The

Washington Quarterly,29(1),145-167.

Felix Heiduk and Gudrun Wacker.(2020).From Asia-Pacific to Indo-Pacific Significance, Implementation and Challenges.German Institue for International and Security Affairs.

Guo,M.(2019).Trump Administration's Indo-Pacific Strategy and China's Response.

China:Hebei University.

Gu,B.Zh.,Zheng,M.T.,Li,Zh.Y.(2022).Influence of Indo-Pacific Economic Framework on China and Suggestions for Countermeasures.International Trade,(10),77-86.

Han,X.D.,Wang,E.F.,Zhao,Sh.Y.(2021).liance Structure,Threat Perception and Bi-

directional Hedging of U.S.Alies in the Asia-Pacific Region under Sino-U.S.

Strategic Competition.Journal of Contemporary Asia-Pacific Studies,(4),28-66.

Han,X.D.,Zhao,Sh.Y.(2021).South Korea’s Strategy toward China in the Context of Sino-U.S. Strategic Competition: An Analysis Based on the Concept of

Hedging.International Forum,(3),97-159.

John David Ciorciari.(2009).The balance of great-power influence in contemporary Southeast Asia.International Relations of the Asia-Pacific,(9),157-196.

Kanchanakhundee,S.(2023).Security Risk Prevention Strategy:Should not be interested in any side or be interested in all sides?.The101world.Retrieved October 22,2023.from:

Kunthic,K.(2017).The state of Thai Foreign Policy Studies A Brief Survey,Journal of

Social Sciences,47(2),7-33.

Lan,M.(2020).A Study on the Causes of Thailand’s "Balance Diplomacy". China:

Shanghai International Studies University.

Leszek,B.(1982).Thailand:The Erosion of a Balanced Foreign Policy.Asian


Li,M.(2012)On the reasons why Thailand’s diplomacy successfully safeguarded national sovereignty and independence in the 19th century.Southeast Asian Studies,(5),106-112.

Li,X.R.(2022).Differences in Security Threat Perception and Hedging Strategy—taking

Malaysia and Vietnam as Examples.China:Foreign Affairs College.

Li,X.Y.(2022).India’s great-power balanced diplomacy during the Nehru period—taking the Sino-Indian border conflict as an example.China:Foreign Affairs College.

Li,Y.(2020).Dilemma and Countermeasure of ASEAN's "Balance of Great Power" Strategy after the Cold War.China:Xiangtan University.

Li,Z.Y.(2021).Sri Lanka Hedging Strategy Research.China:Foreign Affairs College.

Limboonsuebsai,N.,Sookklum,T.(2021).When geographic factors are both opportunities and challenges in formulating foreign policy.International Studies Center,(6),


Liu,R.(2016).Explaining the Hedging Strategies of Southeast Asia States (1997-2015).China:Qinghua University.

Liu,R.N.(2020).Security Cooperation between the United States and Southeast Asian Countries under the Indo-Pacific Strategy Context.Southeast Asian Affairs,(2),


Liu,Y.L.(2020).Leverage and balance:A study on Japan’s strategic behavior in the game of great powers in the South China Sea.China:Jilin University.

Liu,Zh.,An,D.Ch.(2020).U.S. Indo-Pacific Strategy: The ASEAN Perspective.World Outlook,(3),114-158.

Ma,Y.F.(2021).The Reserch on Hedging Strategy of Thailand (2014-2019).China:

Yunnan University.

Manowong,E.(2020).Additional Strategy for Thailand’s Foreign Policy to Counterbalance Influences of The U.S. and China.National Defence Studies Institute Journal,11(1),13-23.

Meesuwan,S.(2019).The project “Competition of influence

between the United States and China in the South China Sea and East China Sea between 2009 and 2017: Impacts and recommendations for Thailand”.Agricultu-

ral Research Development Agency Public Organization.

Nantawaroprai,D.(2020).ASEAN and Thailand’sNeutrality State in The Time of War.Romphruek Journal,38(3),80-90.

Nasok,Y.(2018). Thailand’s Hedging Strategy towards China(2001-2017).Jilin University China.

OECD.(2021).Thailand’s development trajectory: Past and future strategies.OECD Investment Policy Reviews: Thailand. Retrieved October 22,2023.from:https://


Ou,D.Y.,Hou,S.Y.(2023).The Essence and Influence of American "Indian-Pacific

Economic Framework" and China's Countermeasures.Northeast Asia Forum,(2),


Poonkham,J.(2021).Thanat Khoman: A Flexible Diplomat.The International Studies Center.

Poonkham,J.(2023).Thailand’s Foreign Policy:Hedging by Default?.S.Rajaratnam

School of International Studies,(38).

Pongsudhirak,T.(2019).Thailand’s strategic drift: Domestic determinants amidst superpower competition.Australian Strategic policy institute,2020:1-15.An Examination of Foreign Policy Strategies of Middle Powers during Great Power Competition: A Case Study of Thailand’s. Assumption University-eJournal of

Interdisciplinary Research,4(1),19-36.

Preecharush,D.(2021).From Zamia to One Belt One road and Indo-Pacific:The New Geographic Adjustment of Asia.Thai Journal of East Asian Studies,25(1),


Radin Saiful Affendi Radin Tahir,Mohd Ikbal Mohd Huda.(2023).Thailand’s “Bamboo Bending with The Wind” Policy, Shifting Ground Between The U.S and A Rising China.International Journal of Academic Research in Business &Social Sciences,13(2),1611-1629.

Rangsimaporn,P.(2023).Southeast Asia in Kazakhstan’s Omidirectional Hedging Strategy.Problems of Post-Communism,70(3),277-289.

Shi,Zh.X.(2022).The Effect of US' Strategic Credibility on Its Allies' Hedging

Strategy.Strategic Decision Research,(5),20-46.

Shi,Z.X.(2023),The Persistence of the Hedging Strategy of U.S.Allie——Interpretation

on the Basis of Qualitative Comparative Analysis.China:Institute of

International Relations

Song,X.S.,Yu,X.D.(2020).Vietnam’s Perception and Response to the U.S. Indo-Pacific Strategy: A Focus on the Vietnamese International Integration Strategy.

Southeast Asia Affairs,(2),117-132.

Song,Z.F.(2022).The essence of the Biden administration’s “Indo-Pacific Economic Framework” and China’s response,Southern Journal,(12),12-36.

Su,Y.Y.(2020).Malaysia’s Response to the U.S. Indo-Pacific Strategy:In Defense of the ASEAN Centrality.Southeast Asia Affairs,(2),58-70.

Subboonrueng,H.,Bunyavejchewin,P.(2019).Thailand 4.0 in World

Politics:The 5S Foreign Affairs Strategy.International Journal of East Asian Studies,23(2),312-327.

Suphamongkhon,K.(1984).Thailand’s Diplomacy,1940-1952.Bangkok: Tham-

masat University.

Sun,X.H.,Jin,C.R.(2017).Mechanisms of Smal States’Balanced Diplomacy towards Great Powers and Malaysia’Practice towards China and the U.S.Contemporary Asia Pacific,(2),4-35.

Sun,X.H.,Jin,C.R.(2017).Regional Powers’“Balanced Diplomacy toward Great Powers”: The Case of India.South Asian Studies,(2),54-158.

Suthitchaya,Y.Wongsaranon,S.(2021).Foreign Ambassador: Read about the Burmese coup. Reflecting the decline of Thai diplomacy.Prachathai.Retrieved October 25,2023.from:

Troy T.Lee-Brown.(2021).The rise and Strategic Significance of the Indo-Pacific.

University of Western Australia.

Wang,D.(2018).Hedging in International Relations: The Cases of the Asia Pacific Countries.World Economics and Politics,(10),21-49.

Wang,S.(2015).Investigation of the Origin of ASEAN's Diplomacy of Great Powers Balancing.China Academic Journal Electronic Publishing House,6(02),31-45.

Wei,Z.Y.(2022).The Biden Administration’s Indo-Pacific Strategy and Its Impacts on China,China International Studies,(3),29-46.

Xu,M.(2020).ASEAN countries’ cognitive differences and policy coordination on the Indo-Pacific strategy.China:Foreign Affairs College.

Xue,Zh.W.(2019).“Circular between China and the United States” ——Thailand's Great Power Balance Diplomacy from 1969 to 1975.Shanxi Archives,(3),183-188.

Zong,Q.(2021).The“Great-Power Balance Diplomacy” of Middle Countries--Vietnam’s

Balance Diplomacy” Between China and The United States After 2009.China:

Beijing Foreign Language University.

Zhang,C.(2021).Research on the Great Power Balance Strategy of ASEAN under theChanges of Regional Power Structure.China:Yunnan University.

Zhang,X.W.(2021).“Limited following”: A new trend in Singapore’s “hedging strategy” towards China.China:Foreign Affairs College.

Zhou,H,L(2008).How to survive as a "bamboo in the wind" - a brief introduction to Thailand's foreign policy during World War II.Journal of Simao Teachers’ College,24(5),62-65.

Zhou,F.Y.(2020).Thailand’s Perception and Response to the Indo-Pacific Strategy:

Geo-gravity Balance Strategy for a “Medium Country”.Southeast Asia Affairs,(2),71-90.

Zhou,F.Y.(2022).Thailand’s “Non-neutral” Hedging in China-US Strategic Competition

:Features,Causes and Trends.Southeast Asian Affairs,(3),67-80.

Zhu,L.M.,Tian,C.N.(2015).Comparative study on the hedging strategies of Thailand, Singapore and Vietnam towards China and the United States.Journal of

Chongqing Institute of Socialism,(2),65-68.

Zhu,L.M.,Huang,H,B.(2021).Vietnam’s implementation of “Hedging Strategy” between China and the United States and its limitation.Journal of Qiqihar University(Phi

&Soc Sci),(5),43-47.

How to Cite
Feng, Y. and Netkhunakorn, C. (2024) “THAILAND’S HEDGING STRATEGY UNDER THE STRATEGIC COMPETITION BETWEEN CHINA AND THE UNITED STATES”, Berumpun: International Journal of Social, Politics, and Humanities, 7(1), pp. 39-51. doi: 10.33019/berumpun.v7i1.122.
Research Articles